Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Mixing the Modes

“The Ways We Lie”
Evaluate the success of Ericsson’s essay, considering especially how effectively her evidence supports her generalizations.  Are there important categories she overlooks, exceptions she neglects to account for, gaps in definitions or examples?  Offer specific evidence for your own view, whether positive or negative.
“Sex, Drugs, Disasters, and the Extinction of Dinosaurs”
Gould proposes several causes and the same effect.  Why do you think considering various possible causes for a particular effect is important in scientific inquiry?  How does the same thing apply in everyday life?  Think of a situation that affects you directly—your breakup with a close friend, a course you are having particular difficulties with, a problem you face at school, something you have recently become interested in (or lost interest in), or the like.  Then, write down all the causes you can think of for this situation. 
“No Name Woman”
Most of us have heard family stories that left lasting impressions—ghost stories like Kingston’s , biographies of ancestors, explanations for traditions, family superstitions,  and so on.   Write about a family story you remember vividly from your childhood.

“Once More to the Lake”
White strongly evokes the lake camp as a place that was important to him as a child.  What place or places were most important to you as a child?  Describe the place now as a teenager.  Your description should draw on your childhood memories, making them as vivid as possible for the reader, but you should also consider how your point of view toward the place differs now.
“The Clan of One-Breasted Women”
Evaluate “The Clan of One-Breasted Women” as an argument, focusing on the author’s use of appeals (rational, emotional, and ethical).  How well do you think she succeeds?

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Defining Moments

Whether you are comparing and contrasting Naylor's and Leong's reactions to derogatory labels, considering how language defines us, challenging George Will's assumption in "Equity," defining an addiction, OR determining the effect of euphemisms, post your initial, thoughtful responses for the AP Language Community "sagesblogspots."

Monday, March 7, 2011

Division/Analysis Post

Option #1 – “I Want a Wife”
·         Imagine that you want to employ someone to do a specific job, divide the task into its duties and functions.  Then, guided by your analysis, write an accurate job description in essay/paragraph format.  (Possibilities: coach, rap artist, musician, actors, writers/novelists, teammate, friend, roommate, leader, etc.)

Option #2 – “Notes from the Hip-Hop Underground”
·         Analyze another aspect of popular culture---another type of popular music, perhaps, or violent computer games or “reality” television programs or teen horror movies.  Your subject may appeal to you personally, but be sure to expand your discussion to explain your subject’s broader appeal as well.

Friday, February 25, 2011

Description Discussion

Both Vowell and Brad Manning describe their fathers.  Examine words Manning and Vowell use to convey their feelings of distance from their fathers and also in their feelings of closeness.  After commenting on their use of words, discuss some words that you would use if you were to write an essay about the relationship you have with your father.  Tell us what these words say about that relationship.

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Narration Discussion


Reminders: As you respond to your class’s post, review the expectations for thoughtful, valuable, and timely communication outlined in the “Discussion Forum Rubric.”  Additionally, even though you are only responsible for responding to your assigned topic, we will use all four posted topics in our class discussion; prepare accordingly.

 Huttmann presents two opposing ideas of God’s role in human life and death.  For the member of Phil Donahue’s audience, only God can decide to stop someone’s life; anyone who tries to make that decision is “play[ing] God” (par. 2).  For Huttmann, in contrast, sustaining life artificially is “meddling in God’s work” (par. 11).  Reflect and respond: Although Huttmann presents both sides, how does her essay convince you which side to take, or do your own personal beliefs prevent you from considering her position?